Too early Declaration of Candidature of Modi might result in failure in 2014 loksabha elections for BJP

Now a days the hot topic being debated in the whole country is the declaration of MODI as candidate for PM by BJP . Everybody was looking towards RSS for decision making & RSS present leadership also seems to be enjoying new found public recognition and publicity unlike their predecessors who used to work silently but decisively . 

I had been voicing my concern at various levels in RSS about the dangers of being over political and their inexperience in dealing with such situations basically they are a bunch of truthful persons who can easily be outwitted by their nominees in BJP who are true politicians and like any other of their class are full of manipulations and only work for their self goals which have an icing of power brokers who are common to all parties .

In the present situation RSS by sheer haste have converted a winning probability to a loosing proposition by insisting for MODI too early and too dominatingly. 

Think of a situation supposingly LOK SABHA elections were held on schedule say in may 2014 had they remained quite till match 2014 then the situation would have been: 

a) they would have not lost rule in BIHAR;

b) JD(u) would have continued as a constituent of NDA which would have resulted in better performance in Delhi elections because there is heavy presence of voters from Bihar state and under the influence of JD(u) & satrughan Sinha and others they would have voted in better nos then they would vote now;

C) in case BJP performs poorly in these state assembly elections as they had faired in Karnatka then brand MODI will suffer a setback and his effect both on public & the morals of party cadres will reduce ;

d) the surprise element that who will be the prime ministerial candidate would have kept the debate alive. 

But By declaring MODI they have made him vulnerable to attacks such as you have last seen of VANZARA and is not of last to be fired many more will come and we don't know which one will send MODI to political wilderness if that happens RSS/BJP will lose without even contesting.

Secondly had they not decided then everybody in the party would have been working now only a hand few say MODI, his supporters and RSS is working but mostly the heartburn senior leaders are working in the other direction much of them have lost interest actually BJP is going to elections with one hand tied but only if this proposition was deferred till march then NDA would not have broken congress would have gone on back foot because of the surprise and necessarily POLITICS is the art of surprising opponents and taking them by surprise even JD(U) wouldn't have thought of leaving at such a later stage.

All this happened because RSS do not have political brains and those who understand politics like GOVINDACHARYA & SANJAY JOSHI have already been sent to gallows , 

Here is an unsolicited advice to RSS please concentrate on implementing your ideology , be tough and uncompromising on that but leave politics in the hands of politicians YOU CAN'T HAVE CAKE & EAT IT TOO

Is AAM Aadmi Party really corruption free or respect the law of the land? lets check out some unconventional issues

Few days back got a Recorded Voice call of Arvind Kejrival even though When I am registered in Do not disturb list

now we have to look the seriousness of the issue AAP claims to be the most honest and corruption free party but if we look at this issue then there are three facts against their claim:

1. First of all they have violated the "Do not disturb" guidelines of TRAI;
2. Secondly they may have got the mobile numbers of users through "back door" arrangements in mobile companies which may not have been obtained without bribes;
3. Thirdly as per the representation of peoples act the funds of any political party cannot be used for a purpose barred by any law in force and offcourse above two transactions are barred by law.

so AAP has violated TRAI regulations, may have been involved in bribery and also violates the provisions for Representation of Peoples Act, so how they claim to be honest and corruption free party

Is notification of Sections of Companies Act, 2013 a boon or legal dilemma?

Is notification of 98 clauses of Companies Ac, 2013 a progressive step or a legal Dilemma?

MCA on 12.09.2013 issued notification regarding applicability of 98 clauses of Companies Act, 2013 which does not contains the words "as provided in rules". Professional community has welcomed this step, but is this really a welcome step?

The application of these 98 clauses will be through rules only, so till rules are not passed its wasted moreover their counterpart from Companies Act, 1956 has not been repealed yet so is MCA expecting us to follow the contradicting provisions of both the Acts.

For example Section 174 of Companies Act, 1956 and Section 103 of Companies Act, 2013 talks about the same thing i.e. Quorum for General Meetings, however provisions of both the sections are different regarding quorum for public companies and both the provisions are in effect on today's date.